Below what training size do deep tabular generators stop beating trivial baselines?
What it is
This paper presents a preregistered benchmark comparing seven tabular generative models against trivial baselines across a ladder of training set sizes (200 to 20,000 rows) and natively small clinical datasets. It finds that deep models rarely outperform simple baselines like independent marginals or Gaussian copulas, and that model rankings remain surprisingly stable even at very small sample sizes.
The problem it solves
The lack of clear guidance on when deep tabular generative models are actually necessary or beneficial compared to simpler, faster statistical baselines, especially for small datasets common in clinical settings.
What you could use it for
- Selecting a synthetic data generation method for small-scale clinical datasets
- Evaluating the cost-benefit of using deep learning for tabular data synthesis
- Benchmarking the performance of tabular generative models under data scarcity
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.