Confidence-Calibrated Inference Expansion for Evaluator-Guided Test-Time Reasoning
What it is
This paper proposes a compute-aware controller for evaluator-guided reasoning that decides whether to accept an answer, return a fallback, or expand inference based on calibrated confidence estimates. It frames the decision as a resource allocation problem, using local action-gap analysis and expected regret bounds to manage uncertainty and compute costs.
The problem it solves
Evaluator-guided reasoning often wastes compute by uniformly expanding inference or failing to reliably distinguish when additional reasoning is beneficial versus when the current answer is sufficient.
What you could use it for
- Optimizing test-time compute budgets for large language models
- Improving the reliability of evaluator-guided reasoning pipelines
- Balancing answer accuracy against inference latency and cost
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.