Truncate or Not? A Scaling Study of Looped Transformers with Truncated Backpropagation
What it is
This paper investigates the trade-offs of using truncated backpropagation through time (BPTT) in looped transformers, which reuse shared layers to increase depth. Through nearly 600 training runs, it derives a scaling law showing that full BPTT through fewer loops is more compute-efficient than truncated BPTT with more loops.
The problem it solves
Truncated backpropagation saves compute but introduces gradient bias, and it was unclear whether this trade-off is beneficial or detrimental compared to full backpropagation with fewer loops.
What you could use it for
- Designing efficient looped transformer architectures for language modeling
- Optimizing training compute budgets for deep neural networks
- Determining optimal loop counts and training token budgets for specific model sizes
Why it matters
Provides a theoretical and empirical basis for choosing between full and truncated backpropagation, potentially leading to more efficient training of deep models with fewer parameters.
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.