Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Using Routed Ensembles and Trajectory Attribution
What it is
This paper introduces objective-conflict coefficients to quantify the impact of conflicting goals on learning efficiency in multi-objective reinforcement learning. It proposes two main algorithms: routed ensemble policy learning, which dynamically assigns trajectories to the best-performing basis policy, and a kernel surrogate trajectory attribution method that estimates nonlinear interactions between training trajectories to improve data selection.
The problem it solves
Standard multi-objective reinforcement learning is sample-inefficient because optimal policies vary sharply with objective weightings, and conflicting objectives (e.g., speed vs. energy) make it difficult to learn a single policy that performs well across all preferences.
What you could use it for
- Training LLMs to balance competing safety and alignment objectives like helpfulness and honesty
- Optimizing robotic control policies that must trade off speed against energy consumption
- Improving sample efficiency in post-training scenarios where multiple reward signals are in conflict
Why it matters
Significantly improves sample efficiency and performance in multi-objective RL by mitigating objective conflict, potentially enabling more robust and aligned AI systems that can handle complex, competing goals without requiring excessive data.
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.