Role Grounding Attack against Agent's Memory via Social Interaction
What it is
This paper identifies a security vulnerability in LLM agent memory systems where preferences shared on social platforms are incorrectly attributed to the wrong user. It formalizes the Role Grounding Attack (RGA), which exploits nested conversation structures to trick victim agents into adopting an attacker's preferences as their own user's, leading to manipulated tool selection or privacy leakage.
The problem it solves
LLM agents sharing experiences on social platforms lack robust mechanisms to distinguish between the preferences of the agent's own user and those of other agents, leading to misattribution and security risks.
What you could use it for
- Security auditing of LLM agent memory architectures
- Designing robust role-attribution mechanisms in multi-agent systems
- Evaluating the safety of experience-sharing features in AI agents
Why it matters
It exposes a critical flaw in how agents handle social interactions, potentially leading to widespread manipulation and data breaches if memory systems do not implement strict role grounding.
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.