Disparity Laundering: Consensus Without Fairness in Clinical Multi-Agent Systems
What it is
This paper investigates how multi-agent clinical LLM systems fail to neutralize demographic bias, a phenomenon the authors term 'disparity laundering.' It demonstrates that while consensus mechanisms average out individual errors, they preserve and commit to the directional bias of the underlying agents, making the disparity invisible to standard per-version audits.
The problem it solves
Standard per-model and per-output fairness audits fail to detect demographic bias in multi-agent systems because the bias is encoded in the agents' independent answers and committed by the consensus mechanism, making it invisible to single-version checks.
What you could use it for
- Auditing fairness in multi-agent clinical decision support systems
- Designing diverse-perspective ensembles to mitigate demographic bias in medical AI
- Evaluating the impact of aggregation topologies on fairness in LLM-based triage
Why it matters
It reveals a critical blind spot in current clinical AI safety practices, showing that standard audits cannot detect bias that is 'laundered' into consensus decisions, and proposes a specific ensemble architecture that significantly reduces disparity without retraining.
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.