Does Scaling Toward AGI Depend on What System-1 Lets System-2 Execute?
What it is
This paper proposes a 'conditional interaction' loop where a lightweight System-1 predictor gates expensive System-2 executions based on estimated utility. It argues that scaling efficiency depends on the density of utility-relevant interactions rather than total compute, providing theoretical bounds on regret and compute savings.
The problem it solves
Current AGI scaling strategies rely on increasing total compute for System-2 reasoning, which is resource-intensive and inefficient when many candidate interactions have low utility.
What you could use it for
- Optimizing agentic tool use by filtering low-value actions
- Reducing test-time reasoning costs in LLMs
- Designing adaptive decision-making systems with dynamic thresholds
Why it matters
Could significantly reduce the computational cost of achieving AGI by ensuring expensive reasoning is only applied to high-utility interactions, making scaling more efficient.
Read the source ↗Back to the library →
Summary written by an AI model from the source; check the source before you rely on it.